I get a daily email from Reuters Health News that tells me all the up-to-date progress that Big Pharma is making with its drug research. But isn’t it peculiar that after nearly a century of modern medicine, after the discoveries of anti-biotics, vaccination, genome therapy, biotech, nanotechnology etc. we are still no closer to a cure for cancer or aids or heart disease or Alzheimer’s or HIV etc – the list goes on and on?
All the drugs that are spewed out of Big Pharma’s labs are essentially anti-inflammatory painkillers for particular conditions. These drugs only make the patient feel more comfortable but very few of these drugs are outright curatives are they ? Perhaps I’m being too cynical here, but maybe this is the way Big Pharma likes it, maybe this is firm policy with the drugs companies. After all, if there was a cure for cancer, these patients would have no further need for their very expensive cancer drugs, radiotherapy or surgery would they? So Big Pharma seems to prefer inventing drugs/procedures that the patient will have to take for a long time. Look at the “Cancer Industry” for example. It’s HUGE. Hundreds of expensive drugs, Radiography machines, expensive surgery. My goodness — if a successful cure was found for cancer, what would happen to all this huge industry? Well perish the thought !! Dependency seems to be key to Big Pharm’s illusive strategy. Simply because this continuing dependency will naturally mean more profit for Big Pharma. This dependency is a bit like a drug pusher making the user so dependent on his drugs that he buys more and more and more. Hence the huge profits.
Or perhaps I’m being unkind here. Perhaps the whole basis of Medicine and Big Pharma – The Germ Theory - is incorrect ? So what does the Germ Theory say ? Basically put, this theory says this: One germ –>One disease –> One cure. But this theory evolved way back in the early 1900, and was “invented” by Louis Pasteur. However this wasn’t the only theory that was prevalent at the time – there was another theory, postulated by Antoine Bechamp (and backed up by Gunther Enderlein, Claude Bernarde, Royal Rife, Gaston Naessens etc.) called The Cellular Theory.
Here is a comparison of the two theories:
|
GERM THEORY (PASTEUR) |
CELLULAR THEORY (BECHAMP). |
| 1. Disease arises from micro-organisms outside the body. | Disease arises from micro-organisms within the cells of the body. |
| 2. Micro-organisms are generally to be guarded against. | These intracellular micro-organisms normally function to build and assist in the metabolic processes of the body. |
| 3. The function of micro-organisms is constant. | The function of these organisms changes to assist in the catabolic (disintegration) processes of the host organism when that organism dies or is injured, which may be chemical as well as mechanical. |
| 4. The shapes and colours of micro-organisms are constant | Micro-organisms change their shapes and colours to reflect the medium(pleomorphism) |
| 5. Every disease is associated with a particular micro-organism | Every disease is associated with a particular condition. |
| 6. Micro-organisms are primary causal agents. | Micro-organisms become “pathogenic” as the health of the host organism deteriorates. Hence, the condition of the host organism is the primary causal agent. |
| 7. Disease can “strike” anybody. | Disease is built by unhealthy conditions. |
| 8. To prevent disease we have to “build defences”. | To prevent disease we have to create health. |
If you are interested, here is some further evidence concerning both The Germ Theory and The Cellular Theories:
Louis Pasteur Plagiarized Antoine Bechamp’s Work and Lied about Certain Aspects of His Germ Theory
Antoine Bechamp
The Current State and Behaviour of Big Pharm Today
On the Curious Working Practices of the FDA
Hodgkin’s Disease – Research Evidence of Pleomorphic Bacteria
In Praise of Four Women Against Cancer
Notable also, is that the Germ Theory is the only theory that Big Pharma dares to allow — perhaps because this theory fits their money-making “business model” so well. This model — from the One Germ –> One disease aspect — conveniently allows Big Pharma to continuously invent thousands of expensive, singular drugs that are only useful for one particular disease or condition. They invent a drug or procedure, patent it and then make huge profits off their sales despite the drug’s or procedure’s usually vicious side-affects. The Cellular Theory would kill this business practice dead.
And you might well ask, why hasn’t anyone set out to prove, by way of any research, the efficacy of The Cellular Theory then? In America, it takes $200 million to prove safe proof of purpose for just one drug to the satisfaction of the FDA. And the only sector that has that kind of beefy funding is Big Pharma. There are no small start-up biotech companies or Alternative Therapy clinics that have this kind of money. So they are completely shut out of this drug loop by both Big Pharma and the FDA.
On his deathbed, and with his scientific adversary Claude Bernard present, Louis Pasteur finally admitted :”…You are right, microbes are nothing, the terrain is everything…”
But too late, the wheels of Big Pharma had already started to spin, twist and dance to The Germ Theory….
Also see the article Part 1 – Big Pharma : An Ethics and Morals Vacuum
Thanks for all of these resources, the ones I skimmed looked pretty interesting and I will followup on some of them.
[...] See the related post, Part 2 – Big Pharma: The Success of The Germ Theory [...]